Along with any new piece of legislation comes another list of acronyms, abbreviations and lingo for us to get our heads around. As imminent Packaging Legislation Reforms will impact many of our customers, Ross More's latest Blog contains a glossary of the latest packaging terminology.
There are a number of new regulations in the making all of which will impact one another. Much terminology is being used around these regulations, so here is a glossary to aid your understanding:
Extended Producer Responsibility aims to deliver greater resource circularity by making producers more accountable by following the ‘polluter pays’ principle. EPR is expected to be applied in a number of areas in the future including tyres, fishing gear, construction, and textiles. However, EPR in the UK will apply firstly to packaging and this is being implemented via reforms to the current Packaging Waste Regulations, which were the first Producer Responsibility Regulations in the UK back in 1997.
Extended Producer Responsibility will put a far greater onus on Producers to move away from a linear model towards a more circular approach.
The government consultation on reforming the UK packaging system has stipulated that producers pay the full net costs of collection, transportation, sortation, treatment, and disposal for consumer-facing packaging (including packaging similar to consumer packaging but arises in restaurants or offices, etc.). In addition, this must also include communication campaigns relating to recycling and also littering, plus costs for litter and fly-tipping cleanup. Furthermore, administration, enforcement, and reporting costs must also be covered by producers.
Valpak research suggests that the current Packaging Waste Recovery Note (PRN) system covers just 7% of post-consumer waste management with local councils covering a large proportion. Therefore, producers will bear significant cost increases in an EPR system compared to current levels.
HH & HH-like packaging refers to packaging that is consumer-facing or of a similar type. Material within this scope will face the highest cost increases compared to levels under the current system. When we talk about EPR costs we therefore refer to HH & HH-like.
Post-consumer waste management operates very differently to waste deriving from businesses. Local councils are not burdened with costs in the same way that they are with HH & HH-like packaging. Commercial and industrial (C&I) packaging is therefore not expected to see the same level of cost increases as Household or Household-like packaging will need to see in order to meet the requirements.
Applicable to certain drinks containers, the UK’s DRS is scheduled to begin in October 2025. Packaging that falls into the scope of the DRS will be excluded from the Packaging Waste Regulations and the reformed system to incorporate EPR. Therefore, when we talk about EPR costs it is worth noting that DRS material is excluded.
This refers to the tonnage a business is placing on the market. POM could be used with reference to any of the above e.g. DRS POM, C&I POM, or EPR POM. Remember that they are net of one another, so an EPR POM will exclude anything classified as DRS or C&I. The POM cost will vary depending on which system it falls under e.g. DRS, EPR, C&I.
This refers to the flow of packaging material onto the UK market and into the UK waste stream. Valpak Consulting has conducted a number of research projects assessing the UK packaging system including Packflow 2025 and Packflow Covid-19.
Modulated fees are a key part of the EPR system which will require producers to pay higher a higher cost per tonne for placing packaging onto the market not deemed widely recycled. The scope and scale of modulated fees are still to be determined.
This refers to the process of the UK Government consulting with stakeholders before introducing new regulations. It is important that industry engages in this process. Valpak responds to government consultations and includes the feedback we receive from our members. We also encourage businesses and stakeholders to respond directly if they wish. See a summary of the first round of government consultations relating to Packaging Reform here.
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this weblog represent those of the individual authors and not those of Valpak Limited or any other organisation.